Axim + Schema are wondering if any of our customers are using content libraries and would be interested in being featured in a conference talk?
We were wondering if you’re aware of any OpenCraft customers who might be interested in sharing their perspective on adopting the new content libraries experience as part of a conference talk?
I wanted to provide a consolidated update of what I understand to be the current assignments based on the history here:
Modern XBlock Development - @ChrisChV
The Upgrade Dilemma: Lessons from Real-World Open edX Migrations - @tecoholic
Beyond Paragon - A discussion about the Design System for Open edX - @rpenido
eLearning without Internet - @paulo
Learning Beyond Courses (Learning Paths) - @Agrendalath
Building Sustainable Open edX Businesses: OpenCraft’s 10-Year Playbook - NEEDS ASSIGNMENT
Managing Open edX Deployments at Scale - @gabor
Community Retrospective: The Post-Acquisition Transition - @Fox
Design Tokens: Plugin Slots but for Your CSS - @kaustav
Open edX in Action: 20 Stories of Flexibility and Global Impact - @Ali
Open edX should capture the professional training market. Why hasn’t it, and how can we change that? - @jordan
The Open edX Project at 12+: Community Evolution and Lessons from the Trenches - @antoviaque
How can I use AI on my Open edX Instance today? - @pooja
Mastering Asynchronous Collaboration in Distributed Open edX Teams - @tikr
Open edX platform: Are we doing a11y right? - @farhaan
The Open edX Project at 12+: Technical Evolution and Architecture Lessons - @samuel
Themed XBlocks with Paragon 23 - @kshitij
What’s next for XBlocks? - @braden
Tanstack DB: Overcome limitations of React Query - @navin
Works on my machine: how to debug Open edX on k8s cluster during runtime - @maxim
One of these (or someone via trade) will need to take the higher voted “Building Sustainable Open edX Businesses: OpenCraft’s 10-Year Playbook.” I’d suggest @gabriel due to his history with the backend of the business and tenure
The other two will need to pick from the following, or trade:
Content Libraries Demo
Learning Paths: What Authors and Learners Can Look Forward To
Working with Product: How the Product Proposal Process Makes Engineering Better
Importance of non-linear learning
Please let me know if there are any assignments I flubbed, and please comment to make any adjustments/assignments as needed.
Ok. @cassie isn’t here to make her assignment, so I’m going to assign her to “Learning Paths: What Authors and Learners Can Look Forward To”, as I believe she would be well-positioned to speak on it.
@cassie if you get back to your break and have an objection, let me know.
I haven’t heard an objection from @gabriel on the tentative assignment I suggested above, so I think that means everyone should be assigned now. I’ll move forward the tickets later today to give some room for any last-minute objections
@Fox Just to clarify: Should we not post a link to our proposal on this thread, and rather liaise with our reviewers on our tickets? Can we assign anyone (relevant) as first reviewer and then assign Xavier as second?
You can post it if you like! If anything it can bring more hype, which is always great marketing-wise
It’s not required to do so, though. Adding Xavier as a second reviewer also isn’t required-- but @antoviaque let me know if you feel differently, and if there’s any talks you especially WANT to be second-reviewer on, feel free to assign yourself either way.
@samuel The two talks you selected are voted lower than the one you were assigned. We want to present the ones that were higher voted if at all possible.
I might suggest, if you need some places to try researching for this, checking some of the early commit history, and the release notes for all the named versions, and seeing what changed between them. If you take a look at the dates on those release notes and also search around what technologies were popular, you might get an idea of the reasoning behind those decisions.
However, if you still feel unqualified to do this research and come up with a presentation on it, I’m not sure I’m going to find an alternate volunteer on this one (and we’re very late in the assignment game now.) A topic you can confidently submit may result in a better talk than one you can submit but which you aren’t confident in.
NOTE: You are only submitting the proposal at this time. The actual presentation will have 20 hours of prep budget. And it sounds like you won’t be doing the ultimate presentation, so someone will have to help you either way if your talk is accepted. It might even be me. Please factor this in when making your decision.