Hey team, here is a very interesting article in the New York Times about experiments in using OpenAI-based tutors for education in the Newark school district. Not sure if you’ll hit a paywall or not. If so, sorry :/
Some quotes in case there’s a paywall or you don’t have time:
Newark has essentially volunteered to be a guinea pig for public schools across the country that are trying to distinguish the practical use of new A.I.-assisted tutoring bots from their marketing promises. It is one of the first school systems in the United States to pilot test Khanmigo, an automated teaching aid developed by Khan Academy, [and using OpenAI’s GPT models under the hood]
Newark students began using Khan’s automated teaching aid in May. The reviews have so far been mixed.
Mr. Rodriguez described the bot as a useful “co-teacher” that allowed him to devote extra time to children who needed guidance while enabling more self-driven students to plow ahead.
Down the hall in Ms. Drakeford’s math class, the bot’s responses to students sometimes seemed less like suggestions and more like direct answers. When students asked Khanmigo the fraction question posted on the classroom’s white board, the bot answered that the word “mathematician” contained 13 letters and that seven of those letters were consonants. That meant the fraction of consonants was seven out of 13, the bot wrote, or 7/13.
“That’s our biggest concern, that too much of the thinking work is going through Khanmigo,” said Alan Usherenko, the district’s special assistant for schools, including First Avenue, in Newark’s North Ward. The district did not want the bot to lead students through a problem step by step, he said, adding, “We want them to know how to tackle the problem themselves, to use their critical thinking skills.”
“Our engineering team corrected the A.I. a few weeks ago,” Khan Academy said in an email on Tuesday, “so that it no longer gives the answer to this question.” [However, we later] asked Khanmigo the same fraction question. In student mode, the tutoring bot explained the steps and then directly provided the answer: “the fraction of consonants in the word ‘MATHEMATICIAN’ is 7/13.” In teacher mode, which is designed to walk educators through problems and answers, the bot provided a different — incorrect — response. Khanmigo said erroneously that there were eight consonants in the word “mathematician.” That led the bot to provide a wrong answer: “8 consonants/ 14 total letters = 8/14”
Participating districts that want to pilot test Khanmigo for the upcoming school year will pay an additional fee of $60 per student, the nonprofit said, noting that computing costs for the A.I. models were “significant.” … Whether schools will be able to afford A.I.-assisted tutorbots remains to be seen. … the financial hurdles suggest that A.I.-enhanced classroom chatbots are unlikely to democratize tutoring any time soon. Mr. Nellegar, Newark’s ed tech director, said his district was looking for outside funding to help cover the cost of Khanmigo this fall. … “The long-term cost of A.I. is a concern for us,” he said.
My take is that the technology is too immature (and perhaps not even the right technical foundation) to rely on for this type of tutoring. Going all in on AI, like IBL education is doing, is probably not the right move at this time :p
BB-1496